If there's two seperate triggers, even if close together, it should not have problems as being a MG.
If there's two seperate triggers, even if close together, it should not have problems as being a MG.
Sic semper tyrannis
I believe it's two triggers that both actuate the same sear, firing two bullets. It's a solid slide, both rounds would have to fire together.
"...there's always somebody else out there that needs to be whacked"... MajGen James Mattis, to Co G, Third Battalion, Twenty-Third Marines, in Al Kut, Iraq, July 2003
What I do.
Am I the only one who thinks this is a hoax?
Wasn't it Gypsy Rose Lee who said, "Too much of a good thing...is just about right."
God Bless America
Smokey Joe
What's better than a 1911?
Not two 1911's, that's for sure.
I think a TT-33 is better. More modern ammo, better armor penetration, very similar trigger, higher power.
Then... any well-engineered SA or DA/SA gun. 1911 is only so popular because millions got into the US gun pool from milsurp. Sure, it's a good, classical design, but definitely not the pinnacle of handgun design...
[Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains.]
A bit much, in my opinion.
But yet those 1911's of WWI, II, Korean, and Vietnam era worked "right-outa-da-box". Imagine that. Sounds more like a quality control issue than an obsolete design.
Dobe
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote